Disclaimers

Disclaimer re: this blog

The opinions expressed in this blog are not intended to be taken as legal advice. They are to be taken as opinion only and I encourage you to complete your own due diligence when making a decision regarding pursuing your education or managing your student loans.


Additionally, the opinions expressed are solely those of the blog post author and should not be attributed to anyone else.

Disclaimer re: all social media published by The Law Offices of Daniel H. Prepas (including this blog)

The information accessed via Prepas Law Blog, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, either www.prepaslaw.com and www.prepaslegal.com, or any other social media publication made by and on behalf of this firm is intended for informational purposes only. NOTHING contained herein, NOT any information contained in any link that either directs the aforementioned websites or links to a 3rd party website, shall constitute legal advice as defined by both the California Rules of Professional Conduct and the California Business and Professionals Code. The Law Offices of Daniel H. Prepas and its employees, agents, consultants, and otherwise authorized representatives do NOT authorize any of the information expressed or linked from the aforementioned website(s) to be taken as legal advice from an attorney licensed to work for this firm. Moreover, nothing contained herein these website(s) is intended to or should in the mind of a 3rd party individual or entity actually or constructively create an attorney-client relationship between you and this law firm or any attorney for this law firm. While the Law Offices of Daniel H. Prepas provides “Contact Us” and “Email Us” and “. . .be in touch. . .” electronic links to facilitate communication with the firm both electronically and telephonically, YOU should be aware that the act of sending information via these links does NOT create an attorney-client relationship. This also applies to ANY link containing the word "[c]ontact" or similar words located on ANY social media publication put forth by this firm. Unless you are an actual client of this firm, who has a written, signed fee agreement, your electronic or telephonic communication may NOT be treated as privileged or confidential. If you are an existing client of this firm, who has a written, signed fee agreement in accordance with California Law, please remember that communicating with the firm via any of the aforementioned links contained herein may NOT be secure and YOU should avoid sending this firm sensitive, private, confidential privileged information. This firm intends the links to serve ONLY as an initial point of contact between members of the general public and members of this firm regarding any and all matters NOT related to an actual or perceived attorney-client relationship.

Monday, January 14, 2013

IMPORTANT BLOG UPDATE

NEW AND NOT NECESSARILY IMPROVED BLOG FORMAT...

I want to first thank all the readers and supporters of my blog and political thoughts.  You will note that I have now associated my blog with my Law Practice and you should notice a more professional focus and tone from this point forward.  I know that I post provocative political discourse and if any of my past and/or future posts offend anyone, please remember that I make excessive use of sarcasm.  To that end, if you read any of my posts (like the most recent attempt at conservative humor) and you find my words offensive or seemingly inconsistent, remember that my sarcasm is simply used as a vehicle to provoke thought and not intended to insult anyone.  In the next coming weeks, I will be posting a series I will refer to as "The Enlightened Curious George" which will examine the 19th century works and economic philosophy of the late great Henry George to explore if his capitalist-based ideas of extreme land taxation (which were supported by Milton Friedman) can help heal our dying capitalist patient (U.S.A.).  My primary premise will be based on Henry George's premise that no labor or capital produced from other capital should be taxed at all.  On the other hand, corporate land ownership should be taxed at rates as high as 90% to shift corporate ownership of land to individual ownership to ensure increased accountability for land-owners that do NOT put their land to constructive use for the good of the country.  I am an unsure how to approach individually-owned land taxation and hope that the comments to this and future posts will engender a vibrant discussion among people infinitely smarter and more experienced than I.  Thank you in advance for your support and G-d Bless America and liberty for all :)


1 comment:

  1. I love this post very much.please keep sharing of knowledges with us.
    Dwi lawyer long island

    ReplyDelete